Towards A Global Meltdown?
Here's an interesting article about the Big Picture, folks:
The world is at severe risk of a global systemic financial meltdown and a severe global depression
By Nouriel Roubini
The US and advanced economies’ financial system is now headed towards a near-term systemic financial meltdown as day after day stock markets are in free fall, money markets have shut down while their spreads are skyrocketing, and credit spreads are surging through the roof. There is now the beginning of a generalized run on the banking system of these economies; a collapse of the shadow banking system, i.e. those non-banks (broker dealers, non-bank mortgage lenders, SIV and conduits, hedge funds, money market funds, private equity firms) that, like banks, borrow short and liquid, are highly leveraged and lend and invest long and illiquid and are thus at risk of a run on their short-term liabilities; and now a roll-off of the short term liabilities of the corporate sectors that may lead to widespread bankruptcies of solvent but illiquid financial and non-financial firms.
On the real economic side all the advanced economies representing 55% of global GDP (US, Eurozone, UK, other smaller European countries, Canada, Japan, Australia, New Zealand, Japan) entered a recession even before the massive financial shocks that started in the late summer made the liquidity and credit crunch even more virulent and will thus cause an even more severe recession than the one that started in the spring. So we have a severe recession, a severe financial crisis and a severe banking crisis in advanced economies.
There was no decoupling among advanced economies and there is no decoupling but rather recoupling of the emerging market economies with the severe crisis of the advanced economies. By the third quarter of this year global economic growth will be in negative territory signaling a global recession. The recoupling of emerging markets was initially limited to stock markets that fell even more than those of advanced economies as foreign investors pulled out of these markets; but then it spread to credit markets and money markets and currency markets bringing to the surface the vulnerabilities of many financial systems and corporate sectors that had experienced credit booms and that had borrowed short and in foreign currencies. Countries with large current account deficit and/or large fiscal deficits and with large short term foreign currency liabilities and borrowings have been the most fragile. But even the better performing ones – like the BRICs club of Brazil, Russia, India and China – are now at risk of a hard landing. Trade and financial and currency and confidence channels are now leading to a massive slowdown of growth in emerging markets with many of them now at risk not only of a recession but also of a severe financial crisis.
The crisis was caused by the largest leveraged asset bubble and credit bubble in the history of humanity were excessive leveraging and bubbles were not limited to housing in the US but also to housing in many other countries and excessive borrowing by financial institutions and some segments of the corporate sector and of the public sector in many and different economies: an housing bubble, a mortgage bubble, an equity bubble, a bond bubble, a credit bubble, a commodity bubble, a private equity bubble, a hedge funds bubble are all now bursting at once in the biggest real sector and financial sector deleveraging since the Great Depression.
At this point the recession train has left the station; the financial and banking crisis train has left the station. The delusion that the US and advanced economies contraction would be short and shallow – a V-shaped six month recession – has been replaced by the certainty that this will be a long and protracted U-shaped recession that may last at least two years in the US and close to two years in most of the rest of the world. And given the rising risk of a global systemic financial meltdown the probability that the outcome could become a decade long L-shaped recession – like the one experienced by Japan after the bursting of its real estate and equity bubble – cannot be ruled out.
And in a world where there is a glut and excess capacity of goods while aggregate demand is falling soon enough we will start to worry about deflation, debt deflation, liquidity traps and what monetary policy makers should do to fight deflation when policy rates get dangerously close to zero.
At this point the risk of an imminent stock market crash – like the one-day collapse of 20% plus in US stock prices in 1987 – cannot be ruled out as the financial system is breaking down, panic and lack of confidence in any counterparty is sharply rising and the investors have totally lost faith in the ability of policy authorities to control this meltdown.
(Keep reading ...)
By Nouriel Roubini
The US and advanced economies’ financial system is now headed towards a near-term systemic financial meltdown as day after day stock markets are in free fall, money markets have shut down while their spreads are skyrocketing, and credit spreads are surging through the roof. There is now the beginning of a generalized run on the banking system of these economies; a collapse of the shadow banking system, i.e. those non-banks (broker dealers, non-bank mortgage lenders, SIV and conduits, hedge funds, money market funds, private equity firms) that, like banks, borrow short and liquid, are highly leveraged and lend and invest long and illiquid and are thus at risk of a run on their short-term liabilities; and now a roll-off of the short term liabilities of the corporate sectors that may lead to widespread bankruptcies of solvent but illiquid financial and non-financial firms.
On the real economic side all the advanced economies representing 55% of global GDP (US, Eurozone, UK, other smaller European countries, Canada, Japan, Australia, New Zealand, Japan) entered a recession even before the massive financial shocks that started in the late summer made the liquidity and credit crunch even more virulent and will thus cause an even more severe recession than the one that started in the spring. So we have a severe recession, a severe financial crisis and a severe banking crisis in advanced economies.
There was no decoupling among advanced economies and there is no decoupling but rather recoupling of the emerging market economies with the severe crisis of the advanced economies. By the third quarter of this year global economic growth will be in negative territory signaling a global recession. The recoupling of emerging markets was initially limited to stock markets that fell even more than those of advanced economies as foreign investors pulled out of these markets; but then it spread to credit markets and money markets and currency markets bringing to the surface the vulnerabilities of many financial systems and corporate sectors that had experienced credit booms and that had borrowed short and in foreign currencies. Countries with large current account deficit and/or large fiscal deficits and with large short term foreign currency liabilities and borrowings have been the most fragile. But even the better performing ones – like the BRICs club of Brazil, Russia, India and China – are now at risk of a hard landing. Trade and financial and currency and confidence channels are now leading to a massive slowdown of growth in emerging markets with many of them now at risk not only of a recession but also of a severe financial crisis.
The crisis was caused by the largest leveraged asset bubble and credit bubble in the history of humanity were excessive leveraging and bubbles were not limited to housing in the US but also to housing in many other countries and excessive borrowing by financial institutions and some segments of the corporate sector and of the public sector in many and different economies: an housing bubble, a mortgage bubble, an equity bubble, a bond bubble, a credit bubble, a commodity bubble, a private equity bubble, a hedge funds bubble are all now bursting at once in the biggest real sector and financial sector deleveraging since the Great Depression.
At this point the recession train has left the station; the financial and banking crisis train has left the station. The delusion that the US and advanced economies contraction would be short and shallow – a V-shaped six month recession – has been replaced by the certainty that this will be a long and protracted U-shaped recession that may last at least two years in the US and close to two years in most of the rest of the world. And given the rising risk of a global systemic financial meltdown the probability that the outcome could become a decade long L-shaped recession – like the one experienced by Japan after the bursting of its real estate and equity bubble – cannot be ruled out.
And in a world where there is a glut and excess capacity of goods while aggregate demand is falling soon enough we will start to worry about deflation, debt deflation, liquidity traps and what monetary policy makers should do to fight deflation when policy rates get dangerously close to zero.
At this point the risk of an imminent stock market crash – like the one-day collapse of 20% plus in US stock prices in 1987 – cannot be ruled out as the financial system is breaking down, panic and lack of confidence in any counterparty is sharply rising and the investors have totally lost faith in the ability of policy authorities to control this meltdown.
(Keep reading ...)






















This is why I opposed the bailouts. All collapsing banks and corporations must be allowed to fail, it's the only way to achieve equilibrium. In a country as broke and deeply in debt, do you believe that Obama will fix it?
ReplyDeleteHow can bigger government, more corrupted oversight and higher taxes fix a system so entrenched it debt? I'm trying to understand liberalism and the left in general.
What is is your political position? A centrist liberal? Do you have any criticism of Obama?
Hiya bobby - my main criticism of Obama has always been with regards to his "hawkish" stance on foreign policy (Afghanistan, Russia, etc.) and his full embrace of "American exceptionalism".
ReplyDeleteI suspect, perhaps wrongly, that this is somewhat of an act on his part, as a consequence to the 2004 elections whereby Kerry, a war hero, was successfully branded as weak, cowardly and soft on terrorism.
If Obama gets in the office, we'll see for certain whether he is truly hawkish or not - which would be a damn shame if the former turns out to be true ...
With regards to the bailout, I remain mixed on this. On the one hand, I find it abhorant that taxpayers have to "rescue" failing financial institutions. On the other, not helping in some way would precipitate an economic collapse and bring much hardship (if not worse) to millions and millions.
The problem lies in the lack of regulations. "Regulations" are *laws* for businesses, the same as all citizens must respect (proper) civilian and criminal laws. Those advocating for deregulation are essentially advocating for anarchy and lawlessness - which is always how things turn out inevtably when laws/regulations are put aside and/or ignored.
Going back to the bailout - many economists voiced their opposition to bailouts, having pointed out other means to help the financial markets stabilize.
But of course, bailouts are politically convenient and expedient means to show that our elected officials are "doing something" and are "on the issue at hand" - which is, of course, a covert admission of incompetence on their part, whether they realize it or not.
Let us not forget that slavery to expedience = incompetence ... just like ignoring the problem in hoping it will go away ... until it's too late. Hence, "managing-by-crisis" has ever been a landmark of incompetence.
(Oh - and I do consider myself a "centrist liberal" indeed ... a *Canadian* one. Hehehe) ;-)
(Let me put it another way: I am a pragmatist just-left-of-center progressive) ;-)
Thanks Mentarch!
ReplyDeleteAs you said, regulations lead to anarchy if unenforced; however, anarchy is a necessary component as it provides equilibrium. In my view, totalitarianism and anarchy are two sides of one coin and cannot exist without one another.
On the other side, slavery to governmental dependence = personal incompetence! You think Obama is being hawkish on military intervention just to get elected? Well, it's mush like all candidates MUST be Christian to get elected. Haha...therefore, all candidates must be liars just to be elected.
I'm basically libertarian, but pure libertarianism is pure anarchy. So, I am a strongly left leaning libertarian because we must have some governmental control and that control must be strictly enforced.
One enforced regulation is worth a thousand unenforced ones. But the government answers to no one and regulates itself. Equality and security can never be guaranteed by law; for a system that enamored by it's own glorious perfection will always be wrong. That works on the right and left - as in your mention of American exceptionalism - but also in not allowing corporate titans to fail.
In a bizarre way - though seemingly unlikely - anarchy is corruption's worst enemy and if understood, actually brings peace if government gets too powerful.
On another note, I believe Christian mythology to be equally destructive as Islamic extremism. And of course, all religion is mythology and has no place in politics:)
I pretty much agree with most of what you commented, my friend (and no - I am not trying to immitate McSame here - lol). Except on the following three points:
ReplyDeletea) I do not view anarchy and totalitarianism in a "ying/yang" type of spectrum as you do. The only thing in common that they share is the false premise that whenever unsupervised people are given power or left to their own devices, all will be for the good of everyone. In fact, too many people will abuse power, reverting to near-savage thinking that the strong must trample on the weak to get their way - any which way. "Take what you can, while you can" is the rule in both systems. In a totalitarian regime, you get the police thugs, military fascists and komissars, et al. Under anarchy, you get the thugs and gang leaders, mob leaders, and so on.
I suspect that the analogy that you are most likely drawing upon here is "order" versus "chaos". On this I do agree that we need both - the former is a motor of sustainability and the latter is a motor of change, both together ensuring sustained progress.
(Evolution, for that matter)
But in human affairs, unfortunately, incompetence throw a wrench and inevitably leads to FUBAR - including catastrophes, oppression, genocide, murder, even more war (than we've been having), etc..
That is why you will see abuse of power and corruption and violence in both totalitarianism and anarchy ...
b) I do not agree per se that "government dependence = incompetence". Our democratic societies must be responsible for all its members in so far that we are all keepers of our brothers, sisters and neighbors. Hence, "safety social" nets are exactly meant for this - it is institutionalized charity to help out those that are in need. Of course, when incompetence in using such programs sets in, including those stereotypical lazy (i.e. incompetent) citizens who would abuse said programs, then once again we are faced with a FUBAR.
Nonetheless, social saftey nets are the landmark of a society's maturity in accepting the reality that there are times whn it must take care of some of its citizens whom have come about difficult, hard times ...
So, that is not "socialism" (like right-wingers like to call this in order to make it scary and unpalatable). Rather, this is societal responsibility.
and c) I disagree with your contention that "But the government answers to no one and regulates itself". It is true that all too often this seems the case - now here's why: that's because We The People are not doing our job as citizens, we have somehow decided to forgo our responsibilities as the ultimate watchdogs who hold all the keys and guard all the doors, instead allowing the thieves to guard our house in our stead - and don't even bother to check up on them fromt time to time.
As I am (too) fond of saying: mea culpa, mea culp vox populi.
;-)
LITANY IN TIME OF BAY-LOUTS
ReplyDeleteAdieu, farewell Democracy,
The world is all a crock you see--
I am sick, I must die.
So Richard Fuld gets half a mil,
but Lehman Brothers takes a spill--
Why one is saved and one let go?
The reasons we will never know:
Administrative politics
For A.I.G. has put the fix,
But Bear Stearns, uh-oh it is well
To let the people go to hell.
It works in a mysterious way,
The Ministry of Fear today--
O, it´s a "global meltdown," see
As license given you and me
To grab and cheat and swipe and rob
Because there ain´t no other job:
The upper-crust leaves its example
Of how the common good to trample!
Adieu, Farewell Democracy,
The world is all a crock you see.
.